Every fighter is
part of a path.

Trace the shortest documented chain of professional bouts between two fighters. Then compare recent form, finishes, title experience and the quality coverage of their recorded opposition.

7,631connected identities

11,111documented links

6maximum degrees searched

Aug 29, 2026graph checked

Shortest documented route

Tom Aspinall → Alex Pereira

2degrees

Tom AspinallfoughtCiryl Gane

UFC 321 - Aspinall vs. Gane

Oct 25, 2025NCNo Contest (Accidental Eye Poke)

Ciryl GanefoughtAlex Pereira

UFC White House - Freedom 250: Topuria vs. Gaethje

Jun 14, 2026WTKO (Punches)

What this means: every step is a documented professional bout. It does not claim that the fighters trained together, have equal ability or would produce the same result against each other.

Career context, side by side

Numbers with their limits exposed.

These values are calculated from each source-listed professional career. They describe recorded history; they are not a prediction or proprietary ranking.

Tom Aspinall

versus

Alex Pereira

15–3–0 (1 NC)Professional record13–4–0

19Recorded pro bouts17

NC–W–W–W–LLast five resultsL–W–L–W–W

15 (100%)Wins by finish11 (85%)

0Verified title fights0

2014–2025Recorded active span2015–2026

7Opponents with full record coverage11

78%Covered opponents’ career win rate80%

Tom AspinallOpen career source ↗Alex PereiraOpen career source ↗

Shared opposition

Common-opponent ledger

1shared opponent

OpponentTom AspinallAlex Pereira

Ciryl Gane ↗

NCOct 25, 2025No Contest (Accidental Eye Poke)

LJun 14, 2026TKO (Punches)

Common-opponent results are context, not MMA algebra. Timing, weight class, preparation, judging and fighter development can all differ.

Open methodology

How the Atlas path is built

One bout becomes one edge

Every verified fighter identity is a point in the graph. A source-listed professional bout creates a two-way connection between the two opponents.

The shortest route wins

A breadth-first search checks documented opponents layer by layer and returns the first route found, up to six degrees.

Coverage stays visible

Strength-of-opposition context uses only opponents whose full records are already compiled. The coverage count appears beside the percentage.

No prediction is implied

The tool does not forecast fights, rank athletes or turn shared opponents into a claim about who is better.